On 23/05/2014 10:05, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> You can find the code here:
> https://github.com/mbeccati/uuid # NetBSD variant
> https://github.com/mbeccati/uuid/tree/linux # Ubuntu variant
>
> For now, I've forked just RhodiumToad's uuid-freebsd extension, but I've
> made sure make works fine when
On 22/05/2014 21:55, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> On 22/05/2014 17:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, *I* don't want to do that work. I was hoping to find a volunteer,
>> but the silence has been notable. I think deprecation is the next step.
>
> This sounds an easy enough task to try and submit a patch, i
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So, having seen that proof-of-concept, I'm wondering if we shouldn't make
>>> an effort to support contrib/uuid-ossp with a choice of UUID libraries
>>> underneath it.
On 22/05/2014 17:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So, having seen that proof-of-concept, I'm wondering if we shouldn't make
>>> an effort to support contrib/uuid-ossp with a choice of UUID libraries
>>> underneath it. There is a n
Robert Haas writes:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So, having seen that proof-of-concept, I'm wondering if we shouldn't make
>> an effort to support contrib/uuid-ossp with a choice of UUID libraries
>> underneath it. There is a non-OSSP set of UUID library functions
>> av
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was intending to draft something more self-contained to present to
> -hackers, but since this is where we're at ... the quoted material
> omits a couple of important points:
>
> (1) People had been working around uuid-ossp's issues on OS X by
>
On 5/18/14, 12:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So, having seen that proof-of-concept, I'm wondering if we shouldn't make
> an effort to support contrib/uuid-ossp with a choice of UUID libraries
> underneath it. There is a non-OSSP set of UUID library functions
> available on Linux ("libuuid" from util-li
Christoph Berg writes:
> [redirecting to -hackers]
> Re: Tom Lane 2014-05-15 <31008.1400180...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> Sandeep Thakkar writes:
>>> Yes, Jakob is right. On 9.4, we had to patch configure script along with
>>> uuid-ossp.c to resolve the uuid issue.
>> I think we need to discuss this on t
[redirecting to -hackers]
Re: Tom Lane 2014-05-15 <31008.1400180...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Sandeep Thakkar writes:
> > Yes, Jakob is right. On 9.4, we had to patch configure script along with
> > uuid-ossp.c to resolve the uuid issue.
>
> I think we need to discuss this on the open pgsql-hackers list.
