[ discussion re/ default state of minimal rights, as opposed to the
more generous situation today snipped ]
Just to add fuel to the fire, as an ex-college sys-admin having had to
deploy both Oracle and postgres, I would have to say that Oracle
allowed me to deploy a database container shared by
Dear Tom,
> > defaults in "src/backend/utils/adt/acl.c".
>
> I'm unconvinced that this is a good idea.
Hmmm.
> In the first place I am unsure what sorts of surprising behaviors might
> result from nontraditional defaults for these ACL settings.
Sure, this should be thought of.
> (I find th
Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus I'd like to add a user defined default public acl for postgresql
> database, namespace, class, language and proc, instead of the hardwired
> defaults in "src/backend/utils/adt/acl.c".
I'm unconvinced that this is a good idea. In the first place I a
Dear hackers,
I'm used to have a "umask 077", but I cannot have that at the time with
postgresql. This fact is among the many various "surprises" I had while
discovering postgresql, and this is easy to fix.
Thus I'd like to add a user defined default public acl for postgresql
database, namespace
