Re: [HACKERS] use_remote_explain missing in docs of postgres_fdw

2013-02-22 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Wups ... for some reason it's "use_remote_estimate" in the docs. Thinko >> on my part probably --- although on reflection, maybe that's a better >> name anyway? > Indeed, use_remote_estimate is better. use_remote_expl

Re: [HACKERS] use_remote_explain missing in docs of postgres_fdw

2013-02-22 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > While testing a bit this feature, I noticed that use_remote_explain is > > available in the list of options for FOREIGN TABLE and SERVER but this is > > not specified in the docs: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/de

Re: [HACKERS] use_remote_explain missing in docs of postgres_fdw

2013-02-22 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > While testing a bit this feature, I noticed that use_remote_explain is > available in the list of options for FOREIGN TABLE and SERVER but this is > not specified in the docs: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/postgres-fdw.html Wups ... for some reason it's "

[HACKERS] use_remote_explain missing in docs of postgres_fdw

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, While testing a bit this feature, I noticed that use_remote_explain is available in the list of options for FOREIGN TABLE and SERVER but this is not specified in the docs: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/postgres-fdw.html postgres=# CREATE FOREIGN TABLE foo (a int, b int) serv