Re: [HACKERS] unixODBC (again)

2001-02-07 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Nick Gorham wrote: > > Then having sorted this out, I get a core dump, that I have traced to > CC_lookup_pg_version, the code did > > CC_lookup_pg_version(ConnectionClass *self) > { > HSTMT hstmt; > StatementClass *stmt; > RETCODE result; > char *szVersion = "0.0"; >

Re: [HACKERS] unixODBC (again)

2001-02-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Nick Gorham writes: > First let me say that I want to stop the split between the version, If > I can just point people to your distribution, thats fine by me, but it > needs to work :-). I am not trying to get you to standardise on > unixODBC, just to provide the option. This is nice, but it con

[HACKERS] unixODBC (again)

2001-02-07 Thread Nick Gorham
Hi, Having seen that the driver I distribute doesn't work against 7.1 Beta 4, and not wanting to continue the split between the two versions, I have tried to get the driver in the beta working with unixODBC, but I have come against a couple of problems, one a show stopper. First let me say that