Robert Haas writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
>>> teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.
>> I think there are probably some places to fix in the docs too.
> catalogs.sgml d
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
>> teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.
>
> I think there are probably some places to fix in the docs too.
catalogs.sgml doesn't include it in the li
Robert Haas writes:
> While working on some code today, I noticed that RELKIND_UNCATALOGED
> appears to serve no useful purpose. In the few places where we check
> for it at all, we treat it in exactly the same way as
> RELKIND_RELATION. It seems that it's only purpose is to serve as a
> placeho
While working on some code today, I noticed that RELKIND_UNCATALOGED
appears to serve no useful purpose. In the few places where we check
for it at all, we treat it in exactly the same way as
RELKIND_RELATION. It seems that it's only purpose is to serve as a
placeholder inside each newly-created
