Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:39:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I see nothing about 3f902354b in release-10.sgml either.
>> We've had varying policies over the years about whether to mention
>> internal API changes in the release notes or not, but this one
>> I think doe
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:39:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > FYI, I happened across this commit comment:
> > 3f902354b08ac788600f0ae54fcbfc1d4e3ea765
> > | So, let's accept the removal of the guarantee about
> > | the output tuple's rowtype marking, recognizing that th
Justin Pryzby writes:
> FYI, I happened across this commit comment:
> 3f902354b08ac788600f0ae54fcbfc1d4e3ea765
> | So, let's accept the removal of the guarantee about
> | the output tuple's rowtype marking, recognizing that this is a API change
> | that could conceivably break third-party ca
FYI, I happened across this commit comment:
3f902354b08ac788600f0ae54fcbfc1d4e3ea765
| So, let's accept the removal of the guarantee about
| the output tuple's rowtype marking, recognizing that this is a API change
| that could conceivably break third-party callers of tupconvert.c. (So,
|
