Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2: language or encoding

2007-07-12 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Tatsuo, fts configuration doesn't related to the encoding ! It's fully up to you how to combine parser and dictionaries. The problem arise only if you want to define somehow so-called default configuration, which, as I inclined now, is a bad feature. We choose locale name to identify default con

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2: language or encoding

2007-07-09 Thread Simon Riggs
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 15:43 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > I'm wondering if a tsearch's configuration is bound to a language or > an encoding. If it's bound to a language, there's a serious design > problem, I would think. An encoding or charset is not necessarily > bound to single language. We can

Re: [HACKERS] tsearch2: language or encoding

2007-07-06 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm wondering if a tsearch's configuration is bound to a language or > an encoding. If it's bound to a language, there's a serious design > problem, I would think. An encoding or charset is not necessarily > bound to single language. We can find such that

[HACKERS] tsearch2: language or encoding

2007-07-05 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
Hi, I'm wondering if a tsearch's configuration is bound to a language or an encoding. If it's bound to a language, there's a serious design problem, I would think. An encoding or charset is not necessarily bound to single language. We can find such that example everywhere(I'm not talking about Uni