On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar mar 01 19:03:35 -0300 2011:
>> > Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> > > Strangely, we made pg_database have a toast table, and the only reason
>> > > for this is datacl. Should we creat
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar mar 01 19:03:35 -0300 2011:
> > Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > > Strangely, we made pg_database have a toast table, and the only reason
> > > for this is datacl. Should we create toast tables for the remaining
> > > catalogs?
> >
> > As
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar mar 01 19:03:35 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Strangely, we made pg_database have a toast table, and the only reason
> > for this is datacl. Should we create toast tables for the remaining
> > catalogs?
>
> As I commented on your blog, this is n
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Strangely, we made pg_database have a toast table, and the only reason
> for this is datacl. Should we create toast tables for the remaining
> catalogs?
As I commented on your blog, this is nonsense. pg_database has a TOAST
table becase we thought it might need one for
Hi,
Someone on IRC recently noticed that you can't grant USAGE privileges on
a table to a large number of roles. (My experiment says 2466 works,
2467 doesn't).
Of course, this is wrong and all that. I wrote a blog article about
this:
http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/alvaro_herrera/2011/03/gra
