It all built and passes regressions for me on freebsd/alpha, I got this
though:
gcc -pipe -O -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-error -I
./../include -I. -I../../../../src/include -DMAJOR_VERSION=3 -DMINOR_VERSIO
N=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -DINCLUDE_PATH=\"/home/chriskl/local/include\
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcc -pipe -O -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-error -I
> ./../include -I. -I../../../../src/include -DMAJOR_VERSION=3 -DMINOR_VERSIO
> N=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -DINCLUDE_PATH=\"/home/chriskl/local/include\" -c -o
> preproc.o
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Cool. It's just down to this now:
> gcc -pipe -O -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-error
> -I./../include -I. -I../../../../src/include -DMAJOR_VERSION=3 -DMINOR_VE
> RSION=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -DINCLUDE_PATH=\"/home/c
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I see those regularly too, and are related to bison issues.
The two 'defined but not used' warnings in pgc.c are a longstanding flex
(not bison) issue. (Hmm ... I wonder if they still happen in flex
2.5.31?) The other warning is not flex's fault -
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
gcc -pipe -O -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-error -I
> >
./../include -I. -I../../../../src/include -DMAJOR_VERSION=3 -DMINOR_VERSIO
> >
N=0 -DPATCHLEVEL=0 -DINCLUDE_PATH=\"/home/chriskl/local/include\" -c -o
> >
Yes, I see those regularly too, and are related to bison issues.
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> It all built and passes regressions for me on freebsd/alpha, I got this
> though:
>
> gcc -pipe -O -Wall -Wmissing-protot
