Robert Haas writes:
> I was just noticing that, on this page here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
> ...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
> pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
> where it would belong if the name w
On 17 September 2010 18:17, Robert Haas wrote:
> I was just noticing that, on this page here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
>
> ...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
> pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
> where
I was just noticing that, on this page here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.
Is th
