Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but if we make the message DEBUG1 it won't normally. Still, I think
> we could live with that. I'm not inclined to waste too much time on it.
Yeah. I think the only reason it was LOG initially was because the
syslogger was pretty experimental at
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It could be interesting to have it write it *to the logfile* though, since
it'd then at least be in the same place as the others.
It does that too, no?
Yes, but if we make the message DEBUG1 it w
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It could be interesting to have it write it *to the logfile* though, since
> > it'd then at least be in the same place as the others.
>
> It does that too, no?
Ok, I admit writing that with
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It could be interesting to have it write it *to the logfile* though, since
> it'd then at least be in the same place as the others.
It does that too, no?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)-
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 08:05:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Somewhere along the way we seem to have made the syslogger's shutdown
> > message go to stderr, even if we have redirected it:
>
> I'm pretty sure it has done that all along; at least the de
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Somewhere along the way we seem to have made the syslogger's shutdown
> message go to stderr, even if we have redirected it:
I'm pretty sure it has done that all along; at least the design
intention is that messages generated by syslogger itself should
Somewhere along the way we seem to have made the syslogger's shutdown
message go to stderr, even if we have redirected it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] inst.test.5703]$ bin/pg_ctl -D data/ -w stop
waiting for server to shut downLOG: logger shutting down
done
server stopped
Not sure if this is somet
