Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tis, 2011-08-30 at 15:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is not possible at least in the Red Hat world, because all the
>> subpackages have exact-version-and-release dependencies tying them
>> together. That's distro policy not just my whim, and I'd expect other
>> se
On tis, 2011-08-30 at 15:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> While not wishing to deny that this can be a problem, I think you're
> overstating this aspect:
>
> > Now if this had been, say, plpython, which is also developed closely
> > together with the backend, but is probably shipped in a separate binar
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> A while ago, I blogged about the following problem:
> (http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2011/07/undefined-symbol.html)
While not wishing to deny that this can be a problem, I think you're
overstating this aspect:
> Now if this had been, say, plpython, which is also
A while ago, I blogged about the following problem:
(http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2011/07/undefined-symbol.html)
Between PG 8.4.4 and 8.4.5, a new symbol PinPortal was added to the
backend and plpgsql was changed to call it. So in that particular case,
upgrading plpgsql without also upgrad
