Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> shouldn't it be datasize -= avail ?
>>
> AFAIR this is a really outdated K&R style of -= . Compilers *should*
> recognize this (and will throw an ambiguity error if there's no space
> after =- ), but it's better to use the 'newer' style.
Dave didn't
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This just doesn't look right.
Ugh, you're right.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Well, it get's worse, I think after bruce ran pgindent it was turned
into
datasize = -avail;
Dave
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:19, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> >This just doesn't look right.
> >
> >line 364
> >case COPY_NEW_FE:
> >
> > while (da
Dave Cramer wrote:
This just doesn't look right.
line 364
case COPY_NEW_FE:
while (datasize > 0 && !fe_eof)
line 408 datasize =- avail;
shouldn't it be datasize -= avail ?
AFAIR this is a really outdated K&R style of -= . Comp
This just doesn't look right.
line 364
case COPY_NEW_FE:
while (datasize > 0 && !fe_eof)
line 408datasize =- avail;
shouldn't it be datasize -= avail ?
Dave
--
Dave Cramer <[EMAIL
