Re: [HACKERS] src/test/ssl/t/001_ssltests.pl should not tromp on file permissions

2017-05-15 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> We could maybe make 001_ssltests.pl save and restore the file's >> permissions, but I think probably a cleaner answer is to have it >> make a temporary copy and set the permissions on that. > Ah, you are talking about

Re: [HACKERS] src/test/ssl/t/001_ssltests.pl should not tromp on file permissions

2017-05-15 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I got tripped up while building the 10beta1 tarballs by the fact > that src/test/ssl/ssl/client.key had permissions 0600 in my git > checkout. After a fair amount of head-scratching, I figured out > that this must have been a side-effect of havin

[HACKERS] src/test/ssl/t/001_ssltests.pl should not tromp on file permissions

2017-05-15 Thread Tom Lane
I got tripped up while building the 10beta1 tarballs by the fact that src/test/ssl/ssl/client.key had permissions 0600 in my git checkout. After a fair amount of head-scratching, I figured out that this must have been a side-effect of having run the SSL regression tests at some point in the past.