On 18/12/11 20:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-12-06 at 00:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> Rebased against master after the SPI cursor patch has been committed.
>>
>> The first patch removes SPI boilerplate from the cursor functions as
>> well and the second patch creates a plpython_cur
On tis, 2011-12-06 at 00:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> Rebased against master after the SPI cursor patch has been committed.
>
> The first patch removes SPI boilerplate from the cursor functions as
> well and the second patch creates a plpython_cursor.c file.
>
> A side effect of creating a sep
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue dic 15 12:00:13 -0300 2011:
>> How to people feel about naming the files (as proposed)
>>
>> ! OBJS = plpython.o plpython_io.o plpython_procedure.o plpython_exec.o \
>> !plpython_plpy.o plpython_spi.o plpython_result
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue dic 15 12:00:13 -0300 2011:
> How to people feel about naming the files (as proposed)
>
> ! OBJS = plpython.o plpython_io.o plpython_procedure.o plpython_exec.o \
> !plpython_plpy.o plpython_spi.o plpython_result.o plpython_cursor.o \
> !
How to people feel about naming the files (as proposed)
! OBJS = plpython.o plpython_io.o plpython_procedure.o plpython_exec.o \
!plpython_plpy.o plpython_spi.o plpython_result.o plpython_cursor.o \
!plpython_plan.o plpython_subtransaction.o plpython_functions.o \
!plpython
On mån, 2011-11-28 at 02:00 -0800, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 09:45 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > The first one factors out some bolerplate related to executing SPI
> > functions in subtransactions (and idea borrowed from pltcl.c).
>
> While I haven't looked at the code, this seems worthwhil
On 28/11/11 11:00, Greg Smith wrote:
On 11/13/2011 09:45 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
The second one is the actual split. plpython.c has been split into 11
separate files and one header.
Could you comment a bit more about what the goal of this is? We don't
have a reviewer for this patch yet, and I
On 11/13/2011 09:45 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
The first one factors out some bolerplate related to executing SPI
functions in subtransactions (and idea borrowed from pltcl.c).
While I haven't looked at the code, this seems worthwhile from the
description.
The second one is the actual split. pl
