On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's something that we discussed in this CF's patch to ease the
> handling of timeline switches when rewinding a node, I wouldn't have
> any objection to get that backpatched to 9.5 though (the
> DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY part I mean).
In
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> pg_rewind requires that the target server be shut down cleanly, but does
> not accept shutdown in recovery. Is that necessary?
> [blah]
> If I patch pg_rewind to allow shutdown in recovery, it goes slightly
> easier, but it will delete my
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> pg_rewind --source-server uses the libpq default mechanisms for the
> database, but that's useless for pg_rewind, which can just always use
> dbname=postgres, like other database-agnostic utilities.
Keep in mind that the postgres databas
pg_rewind --source-server uses the libpq default mechanisms for the
database, but that's useless for pg_rewind, which can just always use
dbname=postgres, like other database-agnostic utilities.
pg_rewind requires that the target server be shut down cleanly, but does
not accept shutdown in recove
