Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hot Standby had a different timeline, and quite frankly should have
> >> never been seriously considered for 8.4 at all. But I think that
> >> as long as SEPostgres was looming on the horizon, we didn't see the
> >> point of being s
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hot Standby had a different timeline, and quite frankly should have
>> never been seriously considered for 8.4 at all. But I think that
>> as long as SEPostgres was looming on the horizon, we didn't see the
>> point of being strict about deadlines ...
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> > The original plan was that anything not 100% ready to commit at the
> > beginning of the last commit fest will be bumped to the next release,
> > and beta would start right after the first commit fest, a week or two
> > after the submission deadl
