On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Yes, the patch fixes it for me.
OK. I committed it. Thanks for the report.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
On 28/04/14 15:36, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
But if I do first receive after detach like in this sequence:
P1 -> set_sender
P1 -> attach
P2 -> set_receiver
P2 -> attach
P1 -> send
P1 -> send
P1 -> detach
P2 -> receive
I get SHM_MQ_DETACHED on the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I was playing with shm_mq and found a little odd behavior with detaching
> after sending messages.
>
> Following sequence behaves as expected (receiver gets 2 messages):
> P1 -> set_sender
> P1 -> attach
> P2 -> set_receiver
> P2 -> attach
> P
Hi,
I was playing with shm_mq and found a little odd behavior with detaching
after sending messages.
Following sequence behaves as expected (receiver gets 2 messages):
P1 -> set_sender
P1 -> attach
P2 -> set_receiver
P2 -> attach
P1 -> send
P2 -> receive
P1 -> send
P1 -> detach
P2 -> receive
P
