2005/11/23, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I **REALLY** wish you would STOP saying that, Bruce. The current OpenServer
> >Compiler (UDK), is the same as on UnixWare, and is **MUCH** better than the
> >Old SVR3 compiler.
> >
> >We **REALLY** **SHOULD** look at it.
> >
> >
> Well actually
I **REALLY** wish you would STOP saying that, Bruce. The current OpenServer
Compiler (UDK), is the same as on UnixWare, and is **MUCH** better than the
Old SVR3 compiler.
We **REALLY** **SHOULD** look at it.
Well actually no, we shouldn't. Regardless of the technical good or
bad.. We ar
On Nov 22, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Sorry for the top post. If you can get a UDK license, that will work
better.
Oh, so one gets a buggy compiler by default and has to pay for a
better
one? Cool! I'm drooling already, I want one of those SCO things,
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Sorry for the top post. If you can get a UDK license, that will work
> better.
Oh, so one gets a buggy compiler by default and has to pay for a better
one? Cool! I'm drooling already, I want one of those SCO things, where
do I get it? Pity those GCC guys, having only
Sorry for the top post. If you can get a UDK license, that will work
better.
LER
On Nov 22, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Sorry for answering this late.
2005/11/16, Larry Rosenman :
Bruce Momjian wrote:
The SCO compiler is so buggy (and for so many years) I see no reason
to
Sorry for answering this late.
2005/11/16, Larry Rosenman :
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The SCO compiler is so buggy (and for so many years) I see no reason
> > to even look at a bug report from someone using it.
> >
>
> I **REALLY** wish you would STOP saying that, Bruce. The current OpenServer
>
Guillaume Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I've installed a 8.1.0 PostgreSQL server on a SCO OpenServer 5.0.6.
> Some tests failed.. strangely, it seems int4 and int8 share the same
> range.
This is expected behavior if the platform's C compiler doesn't support
any 64-bit integer type. We
Sorry for this late answer. I tried a lot of things and it still doesn't work.
2005/11/11, Martijn van Oosterhout :
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume LELARGE wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've installed a 8.1.0 PostgreSQL server on a SCO OpenServer 5.0.6. It
> > seemed to work well wi
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The SCO compiler is so buggy (and for so many years) I see no reason
> > to even look at a bug report from someone using it.
> >
>
> I **REALLY** wish you would STOP saying that, Bruce. The current OpenServer
I will not if I believe it is true.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The SCO compiler is so buggy (and for so many years) I see no reason
> to even look at a bug report from someone using it.
>
I **REALLY** wish you would STOP saying that, Bruce. The current OpenServer
Compiler (UDK), is the same as on UnixWare, and is **MUCH** better than
The SCO compiler is so buggy (and for so many years) I see no reason to
even look at a bug report from someone using it.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:53:04PM
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume LELARGE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed a 8.1.0 PostgreSQL server on a SCO OpenServer 5.0.6. It
> seemed to work well with psql and such tools. I tried to connect to
> this server with pgAdmin3 and a query failed. I tried to find which
> part of
Hi,
I've installed a 8.1.0 PostgreSQL server on a SCO OpenServer 5.0.6. It
seemed to work well with psql and such tools. I tried to connect to
this server with pgAdmin3 and a query failed. I tried to find which
part of the query was wrong and I have a strange result :
SELECT 1 FROM pg_language WH
13 matches
Mail list logo
