Re: [HACKERS] separate initdb -A options for local and host

2012-01-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local >> and host entries.  In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer" >> and "ident" methods, but w

Re: [HACKERS] separate initdb -A options for local and host

2012-01-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local > and host entries. In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer" > and "ident" methods, but we have moved the confusion into the initdb -A > option, where "

[HACKERS] separate initdb -A options for local and host

2011-11-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local and host entries. In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer" and "ident" methods, but we have moved the confusion into the initdb -A option, where "ident" sometimes means "peer", and "peer" sometimes means "ident".