On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local
>> and host entries. In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer"
>> and "ident" methods, but w
On lör, 2011-11-26 at 01:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local
> and host entries. In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer"
> and "ident" methods, but we have moved the confusion into the initdb -A
> option, where "
I think it would be useful to have separate initdb -A options for local
and host entries. In 9.1, we went out of our way to separate the "peer"
and "ident" methods, but we have moved the confusion into the initdb -A
option, where "ident" sometimes means "peer", and "peer" sometimes means
"ident".