Re: [HACKERS] savepoints and upgrading locks

2007-05-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, emails moved to 8.4 queue. --- Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > Please take it off again. > > > Jeff Davis wrote

Re: [HACKERS] savepoints and upgrading locks

2007-05-17 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: Please take it off again. > Jeff Davis wrote: >> This thread here became a TODO item: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg01011.php >> >> During that discussi

Re: [HACKERS] savepoints and upgrading locks

2007-05-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews > and approves it. Wait a minute. Would the mentioned patch be th

Re: [HACKERS] savepoints and upgrading locks

2007-05-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Je

[HACKERS] savepoints and upgrading locks

2007-05-08 Thread Jeff Davis
This thread here became a TODO item: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg01011.php During that discussion a patch was produced that nobody seemed to have objections to. The main problem seemed to be that it wouldn't always downgrade the lock on a ROLLBACK TO (as I understand