Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases. The tcl
> version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1) will prevent building on Red Hat 6.2
FYI, we have put in a patch that should allow building with Tcl 8.0.* again.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:51 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
> > > The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
>
> > Tom applied a pat
On Thursday 13 November 2003 12:09 am, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I
> > actively run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0,
> > incidentally; there is no minor ve
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:51 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
> > The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
> Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x .
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote:
> My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I actively
> run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0, incidentally;
> there is no minor version).
Have you tried mach? http://thomas.apestaart.org/projects/ma
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
> The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x ...
or is this some other issue?
---(end of
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:57 am, Robert Treat wrote:
> I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start
> one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm
> assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time
> rolls around. However
I wrote:
I just spent 15 minutes searching on the RH web site trying to locate
a complete list of packages in the various RHEL personalities, with
conspicuous lack of success. How anyone can make decisions about it
without knowing exactly what is in it is beyond me.
However, you can see a lis
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
> > plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
>
> I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly f
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having
omitted Postgres (and MyS
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
> plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having
omitted Postgres (and MySQL!) from RHEL 3. I
I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start
one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm
assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time
rolls around. However, given that Red Hat is dropping support for 7.x
and 8.x version on
12 matches
Mail list logo