Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-13 Thread Tom Lane
Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases. The tcl > version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1) will prevent building on Red Hat 6.2 FYI, we have put in a patch that should allow building with Tcl 8.0.* again.

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:51 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases. > > > The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1) > > > Tom applied a pat

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-13 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday 13 November 2003 12:09 am, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote: > > My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I > > actively run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0, > > incidentally; there is no minor ve

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-13 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:51 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases. > > The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1) > Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x .

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote: > My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I actively > run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0, incidentally; > there is no minor version). Have you tried mach? http://thomas.apestaart.org/projects/ma

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases. > The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1) Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x ... or is this some other issue? ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:57 am, Robert Treat wrote: > I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start > one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm > assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time > rolls around. However

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I wrote: I just spent 15 minutes searching on the RH web site trying to locate a complete list of packages in the various RHEL personalities, with conspicuous lack of success. How anyone can make decisions about it without knowing exactly what is in it is beyond me. However, you can see a lis

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Robert Treat
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:23, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any > > plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future, > > I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly f

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future, I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having omitted Postgres (and MyS

Re: [HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any > plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future, I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having omitted Postgres (and MySQL!) from RHEL 3. I

[HACKERS] rpm support for 7.4 and beyond

2003-11-12 Thread Robert Treat
I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time rolls around. However, given that Red Hat is dropping support for 7.x and 8.x version on