(2010/12/14 13:31), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
>> (2010/12/14 12:53), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
(2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
>> The starter version is not intended to use in production system,
>
> Wel
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/12/14 12:53), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
> The starter version is not intended to use in production system,
Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had en
(2010/12/14 12:53), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
>> (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
The starter version is not intended to use in production system,
>>>
>>> Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough infrastructure
>>> in place a
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei :
> (2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
>>> The starter version is not intended to use in production system,
>>
>> Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough infrastructure
>> in place at this point to build a simple system that, wh
(2010/12/14 12:10), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
>> The starter version is not intended to use in production system,
>
> Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough infrastructure
> in place at this point to build a simple system that, while it
> wouldn't meet every use
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei :
> The starter version is not intended to use in production system,
Well, what's the point, then? I thought we had enough infrastructure
in place at this point to build a simple system that, while it
wouldn't meet every use case, would be useful to some people for
limited
(2010/12/14 10:41), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
I counted number of lines of the sepgsql module that implement
only currently supported hooks. It has 3.2KL of code not.
>>>
>>> Uh, wow. That's rather surprising. I thought that it would be
>>> measured in hundreds of li
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei :
>>> I counted number of lines of the sepgsql module that implement
>>> only currently supported hooks. It has 3.2KL of code not.
>>
>> Uh, wow. That's rather surprising. I thought that it would be
>> measured in hundreds of lines. Aren't the hooks that we implemented a
(2010/12/14 9:32), Robert Haas wrote:
> 2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei:
It is a good news for me also, because I didn't imagine SE-PostgreSQL
module getting upstreamed, even if contrib module.
OK, I'll focus on the works to merge the starter-version of SE-PostgreSQL
as a contrib m
2010/12/13 KaiGai Kohei :
>>> It is a good news for me also, because I didn't imagine SE-PostgreSQL
>>> module getting upstreamed, even if contrib module.
>>>
>>> OK, I'll focus on the works to merge the starter-version of SE-PostgreSQL
>>> as a contrib module in the last commit fest.
>>>
>>> Proba
(2010/12/14 1:03), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> (2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 2010/12/12 KaiGai Kohei:
I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
to the current v9.1 development cycle.
>>>
>>> It seems to
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> (2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/12/12 KaiGai Kohei:
>>>
>>> I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
>>> to the current v9.1 development cycle.
>>
>> It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switch
(2010/12/13 21:53), Robert Haas wrote:
2010/12/12 KaiGai Kohei:
I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
to the current v9.1 development cycle.
It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switcher-function
patch ought to be a contrib module that implements a basic f
2010/12/12 KaiGai Kohei :
> I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
> to the current v9.1 development cycle.
It seems to me that the next commit after the label-switcher-function
patch ought to be a contrib module that implements a basic form of
SE-Linux driven permissions che
I'd like to see opinions what facilities should be developed
to the current v9.1 development cycle.
We have integrated some of facilities to support a starter-
version of SE-PostgreSQL. It allows to hook controls on DML
permission checks and assign security labels of client and
database obejcts ei
15 matches
Mail list logo
