On Jan 17, 2011, at 1:44 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> But I wonder if we should add lines in the default pg_hba.conf to "trust"
> replication connections from loopback, like we do for normal connections?
Seems sorta pointless.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 07:44, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 16.01.2011 22:55, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>> In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
>>> to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
>>> attribute to a role - should we change it so th
On 16.01.2011 22:55, Josh Berkus wrote:
In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database
includes replication connections? It certainly goe
> In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
> to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
> attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database
> includes replication connections? It certainly goes in the "principle
> of least surp
Magnus Hagander writes:
> In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
> to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
> attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database
> includes replication connections? It certainly goes in the "p
In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database
includes replication connections? It certainly goes in the "principle
of least surprise" path.
