Re: [HACKERS] renaming "storage parameters"

2009-02-09 Thread Florian Weimer
* Alvaro Herrera: > Euler Taveira is arguing in an autovacuum thread that we should give > "storage parameters" a different name; his argument is that > "autovacuum_enabled" is not really a parameter that relates to storage. > He is proposing "relation parameters". They also apply to indices, rig

Re: [HACKERS] renaming "storage parameters"

2009-02-09 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > Euler Taveira is arguing in an autovacuum thread that we should give > "storage parameters" a different name; his argument is that > "autovacuum_enabled" is not really a parameter that relates to storage. > He is proposing "relation parameters". > I am against the idea of

Re: [HACKERS] renaming "storage parameters"

2009-02-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Euler Taveira is arguing in an autovacuum thread that we should give > "storage parameters" a different name; his argument is that > "autovacuum_enabled" is not really a parameter that relates to storage. > He is proposing "relation paramete

[HACKERS] renaming "storage parameters"

2009-02-09 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Hi, Euler Taveira is arguing in an autovacuum thread that we should give "storage parameters" a different name; his argument is that "autovacuum_enabled" is not really a parameter that relates to storage. He is proposing "relation parameters". I am against the idea of renaming them, for two reaso