Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Ian Barwick wrote: > On 17/10/15 04:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >>> The other item on me is the documentation patch by Emre Hasegeli for > >>> usage of the inclusion opclass framework in BRIN. I think it needs some > >>> slight revision by some native English speaker and I'm

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Craig Ringer wrote: > On 14 October 2015 at 09:57, Robert Haas wrote: > > We've got a few open items remaining at > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should > > try to get rid of them. > > I'd like to add, rather than remove, one. A bug in replication origins > sup

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-27 Thread Craig Ringer
On 14 October 2015 at 09:57, Robert Haas wrote: > We've got a few open items remaining at > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should > try to get rid of them. I'd like to add, rather than remove, one. A bug in replication origins support. It comes with a simple fix.

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-25 Thread Ian Barwick
On 17/10/15 04:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >>> The other item on me is the documentation patch by Emre Hasegeli for >>> usage of the inclusion opclass framework in BRIN. I think it needs some >>> slight revision by some native English speaker and I'm not completely in >>> love w

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-17 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs writes: > On 16 October 2015 at 20:17, Robert Haas wrote: - DDL deparsing testing module should have detected that transforms were not supported, but it failed to notice that. There's no thread linked to this one either, but the description of the issue seems clea

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On 16 October 2015 at 20:17, Robert Haas wrote: >> - DDL deparsing testing module should have detected that transforms > >> were not supported, but it failed to notice that. There's no thread > >> linked to this one either, but the description of the issue seems > >> clear enough. Alvaro, any c

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR) > >> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no > >> thread linked. If there's a stability issu

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR) >> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no >> thread linked. If there's a stability issue here, presumably it falls >>

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all? >> >> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile >> goal, but certainly not a release blocker. > > W

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Stephen Frost
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > We've got a few open items remaining at > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should > try to get rid of them. Of the 8 items there, 3 are documentation > issues. It looks to me like one of those is for Stephen to deal wit

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-15 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all? > > Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile > goal, but certainly not a release blocker. While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-15 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: > - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR) > calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no > thread linked. If there's a stability issue here, presumably it falls > to Alvaro to fix it. But I don't know who added this item or

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-14 Thread Andres Freund
On 2015-10-13 21:57:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > - Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little. > Andres seems to think this shouldn't be an open issue, while Peter > thinks maybe it should be, or at least that's my imperfect executive > summary. Heikki isn't sure he agrees wi

[HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-13 Thread Robert Haas
We've got a few open items remaining at https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should try to get rid of them. Of the 8 items there, 3 are documentation issues. It looks to me like one of those is for Stephen to deal with, one for Andres, and one for Alvaro. Is there any