Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-12-11 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Gevik Babakhani wrote: After reading the thread of 2004 regarding user quotas, I understand why the discussion moved towards having a tablespace quota as a solution. My reason to start this discussion was due the need of controlling database size. Having tablespace quotas could allow one to crea

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-29 Thread Gevik Babakhani
age- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jonah H. Harris > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:55 AM > To: Alvaro Herrera > Cc: Gevik Babakhani; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again > > On Nov 28, 2007 8:09

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Jonah H. Harris
On Nov 28, 2007 8:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you publish it in pgsql-patches? If so, it can be fished from > there. Unfortunately, no. IIRC, I believe the topic moved to being non-user-based quotas and more tablespace-oriented. -- Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Archi

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Jonah H. Harris escribió: > On Nov 28, 2007 3:21 PM, Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and > > IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected). > > > > Does anyone know to which direction we went for having q

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Jonah H. Harris
On Nov 28, 2007 3:21 PM, Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and > IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected). > > Does anyone know to which direction we went for having quotas? I had written a patch for us

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Gevik Babakhani
> Uh, he was asking about "quotas", not "quotes". No, we don't > have user quotas yet. > Thank you. I read we have a "Allow per-tablespace quotas". But the more I think about this the more complex it gets. I guess implementing a user quota is a very different story than quotas per-tablespace.

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Pavel Stehule
On 28/11/2007, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Hello > > > > this patch was commited > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php > > Uh, he was asking about "quotas", not "quotes". No, we don't have user > quotas yet. > I am bli

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > this patch was commited > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php Uh, he was asking about "quotas", not "quotes". No, we don't have user quotas yet. --- >

Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello this patch was commited http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php Regards Pavel Stehule On 28/11/2007, Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and > IIRC there was also some patch for this (proba

[HACKERS] quotas once again

2007-11-28 Thread Gevik Babakhani
Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected). Does anyone know to which direction we went for having quotas? Regards, Gevik Gevik Babakhani PostgreSQL NL ht