Re: [HACKERS] question about new fmgr in 7.1 snapshots

2000-10-23 Thread Jan Wieck
Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > my question is whether i should change the function to use the new fmgr > > type of definition or if it's only for internal functions. > > Up to you. If you need any of the new features (like clean handling > of NULLs) then convert.

Re: [HACKERS] question about new fmgr in 7.1 snapshots

2000-10-23 Thread Tom Lane
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Jeff Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: my question is whether i should change the function to use the new fmgr type of definition or if it's only for internal functions. >> >> Up to you. If you need any of the new features (

Re: [HACKERS] question about new fmgr in 7.1 snapshots

2000-10-17 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > my question is whether i should change the function to use the new fmgr > type of definition or if it's only for internal functions. Up to you. If you need any of the new features (like clean handling of NULLs) then convert. If you were happy with the

[HACKERS] question about new fmgr in 7.1 snapshots

2000-10-17 Thread Jeff Hoffmann
i've started playing with the 7.1 snapshots to try out the toast support. now it looks like i'm going to have to change a bunch of C functions that i have that call internal postgres functions, which didn't seem to be a problem (other than some extra typing) but my question is whether i should ch