Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > my question is whether i should change the function to use the new fmgr
> > type of definition or if it's only for internal functions.
>
> Up to you. If you need any of the new features (like clean handling
> of NULLs) then convert.
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jeff Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
my question is whether i should change the function to use the new fmgr
type of definition or if it's only for internal functions.
>>
>> Up to you. If you need any of the new features (
Jeff Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my question is whether i should change the function to use the new fmgr
> type of definition or if it's only for internal functions.
Up to you. If you need any of the new features (like clean handling
of NULLs) then convert. If you were happy with the
i've started playing with the 7.1 snapshots to try out the toast
support. now it looks like i'm going to have to change a bunch of C
functions that i have that call internal postgres functions, which
didn't seem to be a problem (other than some extra typing) but my
question is whether i should ch