Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/27/2006 3:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is it a problem? If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
>> qsort, but I don't entirely see why you would.
> It forces client programs to link against libpgport, which they didn't
> have to before.
Cl
On 10/27/2006 3:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h
are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
Is it a problem? If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
qsort, b
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h
> are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
Is it a problem? If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
qsort, but I don't entirely see why you would.
since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h
are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
Jan
--
#==#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# L
