Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-11 Thread Robert Haas
2011/8/11 Shigeru Hanada : > Yeah, I have (hopefully) working FDW for PostgreSQL which is based on > the one which has been proposed for 9.1, and updates done by Heikki. > I've implemented: > >  * SELECT clause omitting >  * WHERE clause pushdown (assuming remote has same functions/oprators) >  * p

Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-11 Thread Shigeru Hanada
(2011/08/12 0:48), Robert Haas wrote: > 2011/8/9 Shigeru Hanada: >> postgres=# \d pgbench_accounts >>Foreign table "public.pgbench_accounts" >> Column | Type | Modifiers |Options >> --+---+---+--- >> aid | integer | not nu

Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-11 Thread Robert Haas
2011/8/9 Shigeru Hanada : > postgres=# \d pgbench_accounts >       Foreign table "public.pgbench_accounts" >  Column  |     Type      | Modifiers |    Options > --+---+---+--- >  aid      | integer       | not null  | {colname=aid} >  bid      | integer      

Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-08 Thread Robert Haas
2011/8/8 Shigeru Hanada : > I noticed that psql document wrongly says that \d+ command shows > per-table FDW options of a foreign table, but in fact, per-table FDW > options are shown only in the result of \det+ command.  Attached patch > removes this wrong description. > > This fix should be appli

[HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-07 Thread Shigeru Hanada
I noticed that psql document wrongly says that \d+ command shows per-table FDW options of a foreign table, but in fact, per-table FDW options are shown only in the result of \det+ command. Attached patch removes this wrong description. This fix should be applied to 9.1 too. Regards, -- Shigeru