On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 00:20 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> It seems working well with the latest git master.
> I think it's good enough to be committed.
Committed, thanks.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.
Satoshi Nagayasu writes:
> First of all, I was looking for some regression tests for
> CREATE/ALTER/DROP DATABASE commands, but I couldn't find them
> in the test/regress/sql/ directory. So, I asked the question.
> I guess these database tests are in pg_regress.c. Right?
Yeah, we don't bother wi
(2013/01/30 0:34), Tom Lane wrote:
> Satoshi Nagayasu writes:
>>> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
>
>> BTW, is there any good place to put new regression test for the psql
>> command? I couldn't find
Satoshi Nagayasu writes:
>> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
> BTW, is there any good place to put new regression test for the psql
> command? I couldn't find it out.
As far as a test for this specifi
Hi,
I have tried this patch.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1051
2013/01/29 14:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also add
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 07:14 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
> commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
> objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
> be a bit controversial,
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Good point. What about the other suggestion about only displaying
> > databases by default that you can connect to?
>
> I would tend not to adopt that suggestion, on the grounds that it ha
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 17:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> If we make the postgres database undroppable, unrenamable, and
>> strictly read-only, I will happily support a proposal to consider it a
>> system object. Until then, it's no more a
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 17:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If we make the postgres database undroppable, unrenamable, and
> strictly read-only, I will happily support a proposal to consider it a
> system object. Until then, it's no more a system object than the
> public schema - which, you will note,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We removed showing system functions and operators from \df and \do
> without S. Those are needed all the time. This was controversial at
> the time, but it's the way it is now. The definition of "S", I suppose,
> is more like "is there a
On 1/7/13 3:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
>> > commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
>> > objects and removed system objects from the default
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
>> commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
>> objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
>>
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
> commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
> objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
> be a bit controversial, bu
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
> commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
> objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
> be a bit controversial, but it's how it was decided some ti
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
> commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
> objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
> be a bit controversial,
Here is a patch for psql's \l command to accept patterns, like \d
commands do. While at it, I also added an "S" option to show system
objects and removed system objects from the default display. This might
be a bit controversial, but it's how it was decided some time ago that
the \d commands shou
16 matches
Mail list logo
