Re: [HACKERS] psql \c error

2006-04-05 Thread Philip Yarra
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 06:13 am, Neil Conway wrote: > I've committed a patch to HEAD that should improve this behavior. Let me > know if the current behavior is still unsatisfactory. Yes, thanks, it fixes the stuff that bugged me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgsql]$ psql -p5434 -dpyarra [snip opening car chase

Re: [HACKERS] psql \c error

2006-04-02 Thread Neil Conway
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 11:20 +1000, Philip Yarra wrote: > Hi folks, I've found that CVS HEAD psql's \c doesn't quite behave as expected > when postmaster is listening on non-default port. I've committed a patch to HEAD that should improve this behavior. Let me know if the current behavior is still

Re: [HACKERS] psql \c error

2006-03-29 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:19:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Philip Yarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi folks, I've found that CVS HEAD psql's \c doesn't quite behave as > > expected > > Yeah, there were complaints about this already. I think the problem was > introduced by this patch: I se

Re: [HACKERS] psql \c error

2006-03-29 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Yarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi folks, I've found that CVS HEAD psql's \c doesn't quite behave as > expected Yeah, there were complaints about this already. I think the problem was introduced by this patch: 2006-02-11 21:54 momjian * doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml, src/b

[HACKERS] psql \c error

2006-03-29 Thread Philip Yarra
Hi folks, I've found that CVS HEAD psql's \c doesn't quite behave as expected when postmaster is listening on non-default port. In this case I have postmaster listening on port 5434: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgsql]$ /usr/local/pgsql-cvs-head/bin/psql -p5434 -dpyarra Welcome to psql 8.2devel, the Postgr