On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> OK, I've now committed most of this, with some additions to the
>> documentation. Remaining bits attached.
>
> Looks good, thanks.
And now I've committed (nearly) all of what remains.
2011/8/9 Shigeru Hanada :
> I'm the author of that patch, sorry for confusion. May I explain the
> background of implementing those command? :)
>
> Basically, during implementing foreign table support, I tried to follow
> the existing design.
>
> I found two backslash command groups in psql, \de[w
(2011/08/09 7:01), Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> I am a bit confused as to why we have both \det and \dE. They seem
>> redundant. Shouldn't we rip one of those out? IMHO, \det should be
>> the one to go, as it could be useful to do, e.g. \dtvE, which isn't
>> going to work with the \det syntax.
>
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> (i.e. add "Options" column to \dE+ if we keep that one).
Oh nevermind, "Options" is displayed by \d+ foreign_table_name.
Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
ht
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, I've now committed most of this, with some additions to the
> documentation. Remaining bits attached.
Looks good, thanks.
> I am a bit confused as to why we have both \det and \dE. They seem
> redundant. Shouldn't we rip one of those ou
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I guess my vote is to make the SQL/MED stuff show the description only
>> in verbose mode, and always at the end; and revise what we did with
>> \dL to put the description at the end ev
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> A few existing backslash commands, such as \dn and maybe \db, don't
> exactly follow this precedent. Not sure if we want to bother adjusting
> the existing commands to be consistent in this regard. Defining
> "typical usage" is pretty wish
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> [new patch]
>
> I've committed the portion of this that displays comments on languages
> and casts.
Thanks!
> For domains and conversions, I am wondering if we should display the
>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>
> Attached is an updated version of this patch, lifted out of the recent
> pg_comments patch. With this v2 patch, \dd should properly show just
> its five object types, and the ps
