Hello
>
> The different-numbers-of-arguments bit is what I'm objecting to.
> Just register the function as foo(ANY), foo(ANY,ANY), foo(ANY,ANY,ANY),
> etc, and you're done without breaking anything else.
>
I found simple solution, it uses ANY, but number of necessary ANY
arguments is generated dy
> > do you have any sample, please,
>
> Tom said, try "any". Don't forget about double quotes
>
I am blind thank you
Pavel
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postg
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Pavel Stehule wrote:
On 19/01/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But I am not able create function with
ANY params. Is it possible do it via CREATE FUNCTION .. ?
It's a reserved word :-(. Try "any"
On 19/01/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But I am not able create function with
> > ANY params. Is it possible do it via CREATE FUNCTION .. ?
>
> It's a reserved word :-(. Try "any"
>
> regards, tom lane
>
I did
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I am not able create function with
> ANY params. Is it possible do it via CREATE FUNCTION .. ?
It's a reserved word :-(. Try "any"
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Can't you do that already with ANYELEMENT, or at the worst ANY?
>
> > I would to have independent parameters and move type checking to
> > fun
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can't you do that already with ANYELEMENT, or at the worst ANY?
> I would to have independent parameters and move type checking to
> function.
Okay, then you want ANY.
> Then I don't need register
On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I propose two kinds of functions:
>
> > a) generic functions - this function allows any params without any
> > implicit casting (it can implemented only in C language).
>
> Can't you do that already
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I propose two kinds of functions:
> a) generic functions - this function allows any params without any
> implicit casting (it can implemented only in C language).
Can't you do that already with ANYELEMENT, or at the worst ANY?
> It allows unspecified
Hello
I propose two kinds of functions:
a) generic functions - this function allows any params without any
implicit casting (it can implemented only in C language). This
function have to have specified return type. It usable for constructor
function and for some other. It allows unspecified numbe
10 matches
Mail list logo
