> On 11 Apr 2017, at 10:55, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>
> On 2017/04/07 22:54, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
>> Marked the patch as "Ready for Commiter". But the patch should be
>> commited only after the patch [1].
>
> Thanks for reviewing! I'll continue to work on this for PG11.
This patch has been marke
On 2017/04/07 22:54, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
Marked the patch as "Ready for Commiter". But the patch should be
commited only after the patch [1].
Thanks for reviewing! I'll continue to work on this for PG11.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@p
On 4/7/17 9:54 AM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
>
> Marked the patch as "Ready for Commiter". But the patch should be
> commited only after the patch [1].
This submission has been moved to CF 2017-07.
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
On 05.04.2017 12:20, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Rebased.
Attached is an updated version created on top of the latest patch
"epqpath-for-foreignjoin" [1].
Other changes:
* Added a bit more regression tests with FOR UPDATE clause to see if
CreateLocalJoinPath works well for parameterized foreign join
Hi Arthur,
On 2017/04/05 0:55, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
On 23.03.2017 15:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
I have a few comments.
Thank you for the review!
* innersortkeys are the sort pathkeys for the inner side of the
mergejoin
+ * req_outer_list is a list of sensible parameterizations for the
On 23.03.2017 15:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Done. Also, I added regression tests and revised code and comments a
bit. (As for create_foreignscan_path(), I haven't done anything about
that yet.) Please find attached a new version created on top of [1].
Thank you!
I didn't notice that it is ne
Hello,
On 31.03.2017 18:47, David Steele wrote:
Hi Arthur.
On 3/23/17 8:45 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
Done. Also, I added regression tests and revised code and comments a
bit. (As for create_foreignscan_path(), I haven't done anything about
that yet.) Please find attached a new version creat
Hi Arthur.
On 3/23/17 8:45 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
On 2017/03/21 18:38, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
On 2017/03/16 22:23, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
Can you rebase the patch? It is not applied now.
Ok, will do. Thanks for the report!
Done. Also, I added regression tests and revised code and comment
On 2017/03/21 18:38, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
On 2017/03/16 22:23, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
Can you rebase the patch? It is not applied now.
Ok, will do. Thanks for the report!
Done. Also, I added regression tests and revised code and comments a
bit. (As for create_foreignscan_path(), I haven'
On 2017/03/16 22:23, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
2017-02-27 12:40 GMT+03:00 Etsuro Fujita :
I'd like to propose to support parameterized foreign joins. Attached is a
patch for that, which has been created on top of [1].
Can you rebase the patch? It is not applied now.
Ok, will do. Thanks for th
Hello,
2017-02-27 12:40 GMT+03:00 Etsuro Fujita :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose to support parameterized foreign joins. Attached is a
> patch for that, which has been created on top of [1].
>
Can you rebase the patch? It is not applied now.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.p
Hi,
I'd like to propose to support parameterized foreign joins. Attached is
a patch for that, which has been created on top of [1].
In [2], I said that postgres_fdw could create parameterized paths from
joinable combinations of the cheapest-parameterized paths for the
inner/outer relatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
