Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ashish Goel wrote:
>> The code works well if we don't maintain the referrences but when we
>> include the referrences then the database crashes somewhere between
>> 2500-3000 transactions.
>>
>> So could this problem be due to the multiple referrences be
Hi, Ashish,
Ashish Goel wrote:
> I am sorry but I forgot to mention that in the database schema we are
> maintaining referrences to the main table xyz(int id, img image, fname
> varhcar(50))
>
> There are around 14 tables referrencing this table . The referrences are
> being made to the column i
Hi all,I am sorry but I forgot to mention that in the database schema we are maintaining referrences to the main table xyz(int id, img image, fname varhcar(50))There are around 14 tables referrencing this table . The referrences are being made to the column id.The code works well if we don't mainta
Hi, Ashish,
Ashish Goel wrote:
> But the same code worked when I inserted around 2500 images in the
> database. After that it started crashing.
Testing can never prove that there are no bugs.
It's like the proof that all odd numbers above 1 are prime:
3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, so I co
But the same code worked when I inserted around 2500 images in the database. After that it started crashing. So , I don't think it's because of error in the code. Can u suggest some other possible reasons and also why is it crashing at call to memcpy().Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ashish Goe
Did you follow Tom's suggestion of trying with a postgres configured with
--enable-cassert ?
cheers
andrew
Ashish Goel wrote:
> But the same code worked when I inserted around 2500 images in the
> database. After that it started crashing. So , I don't think it's because
> of error in the code.
But the same code worked when I inserted around 2500 images in the database. After that it started crashing. So , I don't think it's because of error in the code. Can u suggest some other possible reasons and also why is it crashing at call to memcpy(). I have also checked the memory allocations ,
Ashish Goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a following table xyz( id int , fname varchar(50), img image)
> where image is a data type we have created similar to lo.
> ...
> Can somebody suggest us what might be the cause of error and what can we do
> to resolve it ?
Incorrect code in your
We have a following table xyz( id int , fname varchar(50), img image)where image is a data type we have created similar to lo.so when we executed an insert query on the following table :-insert into xyz VALUES (2541, '/home/ravi/jdbc/2_down/76.jpg', '76.jpg');It works well for nearly 2500 images bu
