This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Neil Conway wrote:
> To review, Pavel Stehule submitted a proposal and patch to add support
> for "table functions" a
>
> Sorry, my day job is currently taking up all my spare cycles :( So I
> don't think I'll get a chance to wrap this up for 8.3.
>
> My recollection is that the patch was okay as far as it went, but I'm
> hesitant to add yet another alternative to the already complex set of
> choices for returning
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-25-09 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I won't cry if this doesn't make it into 8.3, particularly
>> since there was some disagreement about it. But if you intend to make
>> it happen, the days grow short.
> My recollection is th
On Tue, 2007-25-09 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I believe that (1) is now committed (renamed to RETURN QUERY),
> but what is the status of (2)?
>
> Personally I won't cry if this doesn't make it into 8.3, particularly
> since there was some disagreement about it. But if you intend to make
>
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To review, Pavel Stehule submitted a proposal and patch to add support
> for "table functions" a few months back:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg00318.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00054.php
> Pavel
To review, Pavel Stehule submitted a proposal and patch to add support
for "table functions" a few months back:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg00318.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00054.php
Pavel proposed two basically independent features:
(
