On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> The latest ExplainPreScanNode is sufficient. Regardless of scanrelid
> (even if it is zero), fs_relids and custom_relids shall be set properly
> to introduce which relations are represented by this ForeignScan and
> CustomScan node. So, addit
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:15 AM
> To: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平)
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> The planstate_tree_walker() oversight custom_ps of CustomScanState;
> that should be a list of underlying PlanState object if any.
>
> ExplainPreScanNode() treated ForeignScan and CustomScan in special
> way (it is sufficient for ExplainPreSc
Hi,
The planstate_tree_walker() oversight custom_ps of CustomScanState;
that should be a list of underlying PlanState object if any.
ExplainPreScanNode() treated ForeignScan and CustomScan in special
way (it is sufficient for ExplainPreScanNode() purpose), thus, it
didn't implement its recursive
