Re: [HACKERS] pgsql oid question

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
"Reggie Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, that adds some clarity. Have base types (int32, etc) had the same > oid values for a significant number of versions of PgSQL? What I am > getting at is this: can I hard code oid values into an access layer for > PgSQL? AFAIK, we have never renu

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql oid question

2003-01-04 Thread Reggie Burnett
Burnett > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql oid question > > "Reggie Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have started experimenting with an access layer for pgsql and have a > > question. I had someone on this list tell me that the o

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql oid question

2003-01-04 Thread Tom Lane
"Reggie Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have started experimenting with an access layer for pgsql and have a > question. I had someone on this list tell me that the oid values that > come back from the server are tag identifiers for that row/column > combination and are not type indicator

[HACKERS] pgsql oid question

2003-01-04 Thread Reggie Burnett
I have started experimenting with an access layer for pgsql and have a question. I had someone on this list tell me that the oid values that come back from the server are tag identifiers for that row/column combination and are not type indicators. Yet, when I create multiple tables/columns each h