Greg Stark writes:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTINCT target.
> hmm. In the current arrangement = doesn't depend on collation, right?
I've been trying to get rid of that assumption where I could.
I think it wo
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Throw error for indeterminate collation of an ORDER/GROUP/DISTINCT target.
>
hmm. In the current arrangement = doesn't depend on collation, right?
So in an ideal world we could use any collation we want to implement
GROUP/DISTINCT/UNION/INTERSECT
