On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
However it would be easy to modify pgpool to allow automatic switch
back (with a risk of unwanted repeating switching, of course). Is
this what you want?
No, your arguments are important. I don't want too much intelligence, but
when I restart primary backend
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> >> I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
> >> two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
> >>
> >> I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and
> >> pg801:5433 as second one. Pgpool is running on default port
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and
pg801:5433 as second one. Pgpool is running on default port () and
I configured my we
On Mar 9, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
That's an intended behavior. Or at least a side effect of failover
design. If we allow unlimited switching between the master and the
secondary, pgpool could repeat switching forever if we have unliable
network or hardware.
I didn't really think of it
> I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
> two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
>
> I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and
> pg801:5433 as second one. Pgpool is running on default port () and
> I configured my web application to use it, so
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Jeff Hoffmann wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and
pg801:5433 as second one. Pgpool is running on
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Jeff Hoffmann wrote:
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and pg801:5433 as
second one. Pgpool is running on default port ()
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and pg801:5433
as second one. Pgpool is running on default port () and
I configured my web application to us
I'm experimenting with pgpool 2.51 on my Linux box runnung
two postgresql backends: pg74:5432 and pg801:5433
I configured pgpool to use pg74:5432 as primary backend and
pg801:5433 as second one. Pgpool is running on default port () and
I configured my web application to use it, so I could star
