Does anyone want userid to be an OID? Peter? Anyone?
If not, I will add it to the TODO list or work on the patch myself.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'd recomme
I totally agree with what you have said. Peter, can you clarify your
reasoning for OID for user/group id?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'd recommend not making any
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd recommend not making any piecemeal changes, especially not when
>> there's not yet a consensus which way to converge.
> Well, seems we should make it consistent at least.
I think the original argument stemmed from the idea that we
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the pg_stat_activity view, the usesysid is shown as having type Oid.
> > However pg_shadow says it's an integer. Is there a reason?
>
> There's been disagreement for a long time over whether userids should be
> OIDs or ints. If
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:16:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the pg_stat_activity view, the usesysid is shown as having type Oid.
> > However pg_shadow says it's an integer. Is there a reason?
>
> There's been disagreement for a long time over whet
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the pg_stat_activity view, the usesysid is shown as having type Oid.
> However pg_shadow says it's an integer. Is there a reason?
There's been disagreement for a long time over whether userids should be
OIDs or ints. If you want to introduce consis
Hello hackers,
In the pg_stat_activity view, the usesysid is shown as having type Oid.
However pg_shadow says it's an integer. Is there a reason? Looks like
a bug.
This patch seems to corrects this issue, but I don't know if there's
something else involved.
Index: src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h
