Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We go to some lengths to prevent non-superusers from examining
>> data_directory and other values that would tell them exactly where the
>> PG data directory is in the server's filesystem. The recently applied
>> patch to expose full pathnames of GUC var
Tom Lane wrote:
> We go to some lengths to prevent non-superusers from examining
> data_directory and other values that would tell them exactly where the
> PG data directory is in the server's filesystem. The recently applied
> patch to expose full pathnames of GUC variables' source files blows a
We go to some lengths to prevent non-superusers from examining
data_directory and other values that would tell them exactly where the
PG data directory is in the server's filesystem. The recently applied
patch to expose full pathnames of GUC variables' source files blows a
hole a mile wide in that
