Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical not accepting -I to specify start LSN position

2014-05-25 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-05-25 22:35:24 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Attached patch corrects that, reshuffling at the same time the option >> letters parsed with getopt_long in alphabetical order. > > Hm. Not a big fan of this in isolation. In the attache

Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical not accepting -I to specify start LSN position

2014-05-25 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2014-05-25 22:35:24 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > As written in subject, pg_recvlogical does not work properly with > option -I but it should: > $ pg_recvlogical -I 0/0 > pg_recvlogical: invalid option -- I > Try "pg_recvlogical --help" for more information. > $ pg_recvlogical --help | gr

[HACKERS] pg_recvlogical not accepting -I to specify start LSN position

2014-05-25 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, As written in subject, pg_recvlogical does not work properly with option -I but it should: $ pg_recvlogical -I 0/0 pg_recvlogical: invalid option -- I Try "pg_recvlogical --help" for more information. $ pg_recvlogical --help | grep "\-I" -I, --startpos=PTR where in an existing slot s