On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> I have committed that version. I think the exit message can be useful,
> because pg_receivewal will usually run as some kind of background
> process where the exit status might be not be visible.
Thanks.
> I have also committed a small
On 7/9/17 22:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While the version on my laptop does that:
> if (time_to_abort)
> {
> - fprintf(stderr, _("%s: received interrupt signal, exiting\n"),
> - progname);
> + if (verbose)
> +
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I wonder if we should actually just remove the second message? AFAICT no
>> other tools log that information. Is there any particular reason why we want
>> that logging in pg_receive
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I wonder if we should actually just remove the second message? AFAICT no
> other tools log that information. Is there any particular reason why we want
> that logging in pg_receivewal when we don't have it in other tools?
I maintain a fork
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Craig Ringer > wrote:
> > On 13 June 2017 at 14:33, Michael Paquier > wrote:
> >> Those come from stop_streaming in pg_receivewal.c. Shouldn't those
> >> messages only show up to the user if --verbose is used
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 06:04, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 13 June 2017 at 14:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Those come from stop_streaming in pg_receivewal.c. Shouldn't those
>>> messages only show up to the user if --verbose is used? It s
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 13 June 2017 at 14:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Those come from stop_streaming in pg_receivewal.c. Shouldn't those
>> messages only show up to the user if --verbose is used? It seems
>> strange to me that at least the first one is written
On 13 June 2017 at 14:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have noticed that the following messages can show up from
> pg_receivewal even if the verbose mode is not used:
> if (prevtimeline != 0 && prevtimeline != timeline)
> fprintf(stderr, _("%s: switched to timelin
Hi all,
I have noticed that the following messages can show up from
pg_receivewal even if the verbose mode is not used:
if (prevtimeline != 0 && prevtimeline != timeline)
fprintf(stderr, _("%s: switched to timeline %u at %X/%X\n"),
progname,
