Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass

2006-06-13 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 June 2006 14:42 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass > > "Dave Page" writes: > > Right, but how

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass

2006-06-13 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" writes: > Right, but how can I conditionally join with pg_opclass based on whether > or not the opclass specified for the column is the default for that > type? Check pg_opclass.opcdefault and compare pg_opclass.opcintype to the index column's datatype (which you'd get from its pg_att

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass

2006-06-13 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 June 2006 18:32 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass > > "Dave Page" writes: > >> Fol

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass

2006-06-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Dave Page" writes: >> Following a pgAdmin bug report, I noticed that pg_get_viewdef doesn't >> return the opclass when called for a specific column (in 8.1 >> at least) - > Bah, I mean pg_get_indexdef of course :-) This is intentional --- whoever asked for the per-column variant of the indexd

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_INDEXdef - opclass

2006-06-12 Thread Dave Page
Bah, I mean pg_get_indexdef of course :-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page > Sent: 12 June 2006 12:12 > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] pg_get_viewdef - opclass > > Following a pgAdmin bug report, I n