Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and minor versions

2007-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:09:30PM +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote: >> While playing around with various postgresql installations i recognized >> that pg_dump complaints even within major-releases about different >> minor-numbers, such as: >> >> pg_dump: s

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and minor versions

2007-06-29 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On Freitag, Juni 29, 2007 15:32:19 +0200 Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:09:30PM +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote: Short question: While playing around with various postgresql installations i recognized that pg_dump complaints even within major-releases about

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and minor versions

2007-06-29 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:09:30PM +0200, Bernd Helmle wrote: > Short question: > > While playing around with various postgresql installations i recognized > that pg_dump complaints even within major-releases about different > minor-numbers, such as: > > pg_dump: server version: 8.2.4; pg_dump

[HACKERS] pg_dump and minor versions

2007-06-29 Thread Bernd Helmle
Short question: While playing around with various postgresql installations i recognized that pg_dump complaints even within major-releases about different minor-numbers, such as: pg_dump: server version: 8.2.4; pg_dump version: 8.2.0 I thought we are safe against pg_dump changes within a min