On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> Patch looks and tests good to me. Only thing that seemed to be
> missing was documentation of the new pg_dump(all) and guc params.
> Find attached a stab at this. Yeah the docs I added need work, but I
> figure if you are anything like me i
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 18:35, Robert Haas wrote:
*Waves* Hi!
Patch looks and tests good to me. Only thing that seemed to be
missing was documentation of the new pg_dump(all) and guc params.
Find attached a stab at this. Yeah the docs I added need work, but I
figure if you are anything like me
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Uh, I thought this was about quoting the identifiers. I am confused
>> about why "integer" is an issue in this case. Can you show an example?
> Sure.
INTEGER is actually a keyword in this context, not an identifier
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> In response to a complaint from Hartmut Goebel:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00018.php
>>
>> And per a design proposed by Tom Lane:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/ms
Robert Haas wrote:
> In response to a complaint from Hartmut Goebel:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00018.php
>
> And per a design proposed by Tom Lane:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00211.php
>
> PFA a patch to implement $SUBJECT. One inter
In response to a complaint from Hartmut Goebel:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00018.php
And per a design proposed by Tom Lane:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-06/msg00211.php
PFA a patch to implement $SUBJECT. One interesting aspect of this
patch is that t
