Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anybody recall a reason for why the do_restart() function in pg_ctl
> copies a lot of code almost right off from do_stop(), instead of just
> having that code exactly the same as do_stop() and factored out? (Like
> it does for do_start() already)
>
Can anybody recall a reason for why the do_restart() function in pg_ctl
copies a lot of code almost right off from do_stop(), instead of just
having that code exactly the same as do_stop() and factored out? (Like
it does for do_start() already)
I see the point in dealing with the very first branch
