Hehehe
- try FreeBSD for stability over Linux as well :)
Chris
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nicolas
BazinSent: Wednesday, 10 July 2002 9:55 AMTo: Eric
Redmond; 'PostGreSQL Hackers'Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
worth paying
for.
- Original Message -
From:
Eric
Redmond
To: 'PostGreSQL Hackers'
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:37
AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_access
Yeah,
sure. Whatever.
Eric
-Original
Message-From: [EMAIL
Yeah, sure. Whatever.
Eric
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:35
PM
To: PostGreSQL Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_access
Dear Eric,
Thanks for your input! I&#
used to and sadly often expect poor interfaces
with the programs they use. Windows users are far less forgiving. If, what you
are talking about, is truly wide spread use for PCs and small-time web-servers
then a Windows interface is damn near necessary.
Eric
-Original
Message-
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: PostGreSQL Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_access
>
>
>
> I'm pleased to see some renewed interest in pg_access. It seems obvious to me
> that MS Access is not curre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:05 PM
To: PostGreSQL Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_access
I'm pleased to see some renewed
interest in pg_access. It seems obvious to me th
I'm pleased to see some renewed interest in
pg_access. It seems obvious to me that MS Access is not currently...and
probably never will be able to handle data in a robust and reliable
fashion. MS Access' apparent success is due to the user interface quality
and "ease of use" for "non-progr
